| ||
| ||
| ||
L’Associazione Corridoi Atlantici presenta A Rhetorical View of Law JAMES BOYD WHITE Hart Wright Professor of Law Emeritus The University of Michigan CHAIRMAN: PIER GIUSEPPE MONATERI (Professore ordinario Diritto civile Facoltà di Giurisprudenza ,Università di Torino) DISCUSSANT: Anthony Marasco (Docente Lingua e Letteratura Americana all'Università degli Studi di Venezia, Ca' Foscari) | ||
Lunedì 7 giugno 2010 – ore 11 Hotel Regina Palace, Sala Rododendro Corso Umberto I, 29 – Stresa | ||
Con il patrocinio di: | Si ringraziano: • Centro Ricerca e Documentazione “Luigi Einaudi” | |
Per iscrizioni e ulteriori informazioni: Rosella Orelio – Tel. 011 5591611 – segreteria@corridoiatlantici.it | ||
lunedì 31 maggio 2010
James Boyd White, PG Monateri and Anthony Marasco at the Stresa Lectures
mercoledì 26 maggio 2010
I risultati delle votazioni e le estrazioni dei Concorsi da Ricercatore
venerdì 21 maggio 2010
inaugurato oggi il colloquio dei giovani comparatisti
con un grande successo di partecipazione si è aperto oggi a Catania il colloquio dei giovani comparatisti
in apertura,dopo l' introduzione del presidente Monateri, il prof. Frosini ha tracciato un commosso ricordo di Giorgio Lombardi.
presto sul sito tutte le foto del convegno
in apertura,dopo l' introduzione del presidente Monateri, il prof. Frosini ha tracciato un commosso ricordo di Giorgio Lombardi.
presto sul sito tutte le foto del convegno
Giorgio Lombardi Dies
Pochi minuti fa ci ha lasciato Giorgio Lombardi, grande studioso e grande insegnante.
In questo momento particolarmente commovente mi piace ricordarlo come lo incontrai la prima volta sui banchi dell'Aula Magna di Giurisprudenza.
Egli fu per me il primo professore della prima lezione in Diritto, ed il primo con cui diedi un esame.
Uomo impareggiabile e grande amico riceva da tutti noi un ultimo commosso saluto
PG Monateri
In questo momento particolarmente commovente mi piace ricordarlo come lo incontrai la prima volta sui banchi dell'Aula Magna di Giurisprudenza.
Egli fu per me il primo professore della prima lezione in Diritto, ed il primo con cui diedi un esame.
Uomo impareggiabile e grande amico riceva da tutti noi un ultimo commosso saluto
PG Monateri
lunedì 17 maggio 2010
Romanian Association of Comparative Law on the Web
Visit The New Site of the Romanian Association of Comparative Law
Posted By
Professor Florin Ciutacu Ph.D.
President of the Association
venerdì 14 maggio 2010
Nuova Rivista Online : Comparazione e Diritto Civile
La rivistaLa nascita di una nuova rivista è accadimento non privo di significato: essa va salutata con attenta considerazione e con impegno consapevole delle difficoltà.L'utilità non si esaurisce nell'immediatezza dell'informazione: pur caratteristica necessaria di una rivista on line.
La rivista si propone altresì come affermazione e testimonianza di un indirizzo di ricerca e d'insegnamento che nel metodo comparatistico rinviene il momento di specificazione e di unificazione. Ma tale finalità si persegue sul presupposto ineludibile di un'approfondita conoscenza del c.d. diritto municipale: di qui il nome di comparazione e diritto civile.
L'ulteriore consapevolezza è che un diritto civile moderno, interpretato costituzionalmente e nel solco del diritto comunitario, ruota intorno alla persona umana e agli interessi da questa manifestati: esso di tutto ciò si rende interprete, organizzatore e garante.
In tale prospettiva, l'apporto del diritto vivente - nelle decisioni giurisprudenziali e delle autorità garanti - è elemento indefettibile.
Per altro verso, la complessità e il pluralismo delle fonti inducono ad affrontare il singolo, concreto problema in una dimensione che - pur nella salvaguardia delle peculiarità - non perda di vista l'unitarietà dell'ordinamento giuridico e la sua organizzazione sistemica.
La rivista è aperta a tutti gli studiosi in uno scambio continuo - facilitato dallo strumento elettronico e in assenza di assillanti scadenze temporali - di vedute e di esperienze: una palestra, soprattutto per i giovani che coltivano il diritto civile con rigore antico e con modernità di prospettive.
Read more ...
European Society for Comparative Legal History : Inaugural Conference
The Inaugural Conference of the European Society for Comparative Legal History (ESCLH) will take place from 5-6 July 2010 at the University of Valencia (Valencia, Spain).
Speakers will include:
• R Jovita Baber, University of Illinois, “Multiplicity of Meanings: Legal Pluralism and the Layer Legality of Land in Sixteenth-century Andes”
• Louis Berkvens, Maastricht University, “An Approach of comparative history of legislation”
• Juan B. Cañizares, University of Valencia / MPIER, Frankfurt/M, “The notion of honour in the injury and slander offences. Normative and scholarly legal comparative approach between Spain and France, late 18th century-late 19th century”
• Chao-ju Chen, National Taiwan University, “In the Name of the Mother: A Feminist Legal History of Naming in Taiwan”
• Serge Dauchy, University of Lille–Nord de France, “A comparative study of legal culture in early Modern Europe”
• Seán Patrick Donlan, University of Limerick, “World is crazier and more of it than we think”: histories of legal and normative hybridity”
• Paul J. du Plessis, Edinburgh University, “Law, modernity and the place of European legal history”
• Matt Dyson, University of Cambridge, “Comparative Legal History: methodology for morphology”
• Francesca Galli, Institut d’Etudes Européennes, Section Juridique, ULB, Brussels, “British, French and Italian measures to deal with terrorism: a comparative study”
• Eduardo Galván, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, “How to govern an archipelago? The Channel Islands and the Canary Islands”
• Jean-François Gerkens, University of Liège, “The Liberation of the Debtor in mora by vis maior, or the Incredible Success Story of a Non Roman Rule”
• Adolfo Giuliani, University of Cambridge, “Two models of fact-finding”
• Jan Hallebeek, VU University Amsterdam, “Some Remarks on the Direct Enforcement of Obligations to Do in the Continental Legal Tradition”
• Karl Härter, MPIER, Frankfurt/M, “The Emergence of the International Order of Criminal Prosecution in the Modern Age: Extradition, Asylum and Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters”
• Nikitas Hatzimihail, University of Cyprus, “Pre-Historical Private International Law: A Study in Conflicts Historiography”
• Dirk Heirbaut, Ghent University, “Feudal law in Flanders and the Lotharingian principalities: a comparison”
• David Ibbetson, University of Cambridge, “Comparative Legal History: A Methodology”
• Nir Kedar, Bar-Ilan University, “Transplanted Law v. Transplanted Culture: The Unique Case of Israeli Legal History”
• Marcelo Lacombe, NYU, “Constitutionalism , liberalism and militarism. A comparative approach on the evolution of constitutional systems in Europe and Latin America, during the nineteenth century?”
• Pia Letto-Vanamo, University of Helsinki, “Some Remarks on the History of Legal Argumentation”
• Michael A Livingston, Rutgers School of Law, “One Hatred, Many Laws: The Evolution of Antisemitic Laws in Germany, France, and Italy in Comparative Historical Perspective”
Posted by Sean Donlan on the ComparativeLawBlog
Speakers will include:
• R Jovita Baber, University of Illinois, “Multiplicity of Meanings: Legal Pluralism and the Layer Legality of Land in Sixteenth-century Andes”
• Louis Berkvens, Maastricht University, “An Approach of comparative history of legislation”
• Juan B. Cañizares, University of Valencia / MPIER, Frankfurt/M, “The notion of honour in the injury and slander offences. Normative and scholarly legal comparative approach between Spain and France, late 18th century-late 19th century”
• Chao-ju Chen, National Taiwan University, “In the Name of the Mother: A Feminist Legal History of Naming in Taiwan”
• Serge Dauchy, University of Lille–Nord de France, “A comparative study of legal culture in early Modern Europe”
• Seán Patrick Donlan, University of Limerick, “World is crazier and more of it than we think”: histories of legal and normative hybridity”
• Paul J. du Plessis, Edinburgh University, “Law, modernity and the place of European legal history”
• Matt Dyson, University of Cambridge, “Comparative Legal History: methodology for morphology”
• Francesca Galli, Institut d’Etudes Européennes, Section Juridique, ULB, Brussels, “British, French and Italian measures to deal with terrorism: a comparative study”
• Eduardo Galván, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, “How to govern an archipelago? The Channel Islands and the Canary Islands”
• Jean-François Gerkens, University of Liège, “The Liberation of the Debtor in mora by vis maior, or the Incredible Success Story of a Non Roman Rule”
• Adolfo Giuliani, University of Cambridge, “Two models of fact-finding”
• Jan Hallebeek, VU University Amsterdam, “Some Remarks on the Direct Enforcement of Obligations to Do in the Continental Legal Tradition”
• Karl Härter, MPIER, Frankfurt/M, “The Emergence of the International Order of Criminal Prosecution in the Modern Age: Extradition, Asylum and Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters”
• Nikitas Hatzimihail, University of Cyprus, “Pre-Historical Private International Law: A Study in Conflicts Historiography”
• Dirk Heirbaut, Ghent University, “Feudal law in Flanders and the Lotharingian principalities: a comparison”
• David Ibbetson, University of Cambridge, “Comparative Legal History: A Methodology”
• Nir Kedar, Bar-Ilan University, “Transplanted Law v. Transplanted Culture: The Unique Case of Israeli Legal History”
• Marcelo Lacombe, NYU, “Constitutionalism , liberalism and militarism. A comparative approach on the evolution of constitutional systems in Europe and Latin America, during the nineteenth century?”
• Pia Letto-Vanamo, University of Helsinki, “Some Remarks on the History of Legal Argumentation”
• Michael A Livingston, Rutgers School of Law, “One Hatred, Many Laws: The Evolution of Antisemitic Laws in Germany, France, and Italy in Comparative Historical Perspective”
Posted by Sean Donlan on the ComparativeLawBlog
giovedì 13 maggio 2010
Parere CUN : Confermata affinità tra Jus02 e Jus21
ho il piacere di informarvi che nei giorni scorsi, a seguito della forte iniziativa svolta dall'associazione in tutte le sedi, il Consiglio Universitario Nazionale ha espresso al Ministero il parere che l'attuale affinità concorsuale per il SSD IUS 02 (diritto privato comparato) vada modificata estendendola al SSD IUS 21 (diritto pubblico comparato). Tale modifica deve valere già per la I tornata 2008 dei concorsi, attualmente bloccati a seguito delle censure mosse dall'AIDC, la cui validità è stata riconosciuta, con sentenza passata in giudicato, dal TAR.
Si tratta di un sostanziale accoglimento delle ragioni che l'Associazione ha presentato in oltre quattro anni di iniziativa amministrativa e giudiziaria.
In primo luogo l'estensione della affinità a IUS 21 introduce una decisiva nota plurale nella composizione delle prossime commissioni di concorso. Mentre finora la lista dei 144 sorteggiabili avrebbe dovuto essere composta da 99 professori di diritto privato e da 45 di diritto privato comparato, l'allargamento ai colleghi di pubblico comparato consente di evitare tale dominanza rendendo possibile una paritaria presenza nella lista dei sorteggiabili dei tre raggruppamenti (IUS 02, IUS 01 e IUS 21), fermo restando che della commissione almeno tre membri dovranno appartenere al SSD IUS 02.
Inoltre la decisione sana una palese discriminazione in danno dei colleghi di diritto pubblico comparato: infatti mentre i docenti di IUS 02 sono chiamati a far parte delle commissioni di IUS 21, non valeva l'inverso.
Nell'esprimere l'apprezzamento per l'ulteriore riconoscimento del CUN alle ragioni di affinità metodologica e culturale che uniscono i comparatisti (che si aggiunge alla previsione, deliberata nel novembre scorso, di un unico raggruppamento di “Diritto comparato”), e nell'esprimere un pubblico ringraziamento alla fattiva opera svolta dal Presidente del CUN, prof. Andrea Lenzi, e dalla amica e collega Fiorella D'Angeli, decana dell'area giuridica in quel consesso, desidero assicurare tutti gli associati che l'AIDC sta già operando perchè il parere del CUN si traduca nei conseguenti atti normativi ministeriali e vengano rapidamente indette le elezioni per la costituzione delle commissioni di concorso.
Con i miei più cordiali saluti
Il Presidente
(PG Monateri)
mercoledì 12 maggio 2010
South Caucasus Law Journal
South Caucasus Law Journal
Legal Research Plus (Sergio Stone) – 11/05/10 23.13
The German Technical Cooperation (GTZ) has published the inaugural issue of the South Caucasus Law Journal. It appears that the journal will be free and available online. Articles are published in Russian and English. Information about the South Caucasus Law Journal: http://www.gtz.de/en/weltweit/europa-kaukasus-zentralasien/30344.htm Editorial Board of the South Caucasus Law Journal Email: lawjournal_caucasus@gtz.de Full-text of Volume 1, [...]
http://www.gtz.de/en/weltweit/europa-kaukasus-zentralasien/30344.htm
Legal Research Plus (Sergio Stone) – 11/05/10 23.13
The German Technical Cooperation (GTZ) has published the inaugural issue of the South Caucasus Law Journal. It appears that the journal will be free and available online. Articles are published in Russian and English. Information about the South Caucasus Law Journal: http://www.gtz.de/en/weltweit/europa-kaukasus-zentralasien/30344.htm Editorial Board of the South Caucasus Law Journal Email: lawjournal_caucasus@gtz.de Full-text of Volume 1, [...]
http://www.gtz.de/en/weltweit/europa-kaukasus-zentralasien/30344.htm
lunedì 10 maggio 2010
AIDC : To Release A Newer Review on Comparative Law
WWW.COMPARATIVELAWREVIEW.COM
Prossimo evento : per iniziativa della AIDC sta per uscire il primo numero della
Comparative Law Review
A New International Journal to give a worldwide stand to the Italian legal scholarship on the Web
from the Old to the New ...
The Comparative Law Review will be available also on Kindle
Stay tuned : forthcoming articles in few days ....
New East Asian Law Journal
Airiti Press of Taiwan has released the inaugural issue of the East Asian Law Journal , which will publish articles in English and Chinese. Two issues published per year. Editorial Board members hail from National Taiwan University. East Asian Law Journal 東亞法學評論 http://www.airitipress.com/index.aspx?func=journaldetail&PublicationID=201003260001
Vo.l1 No. 1. March 2010. Table of Contents Where Does Law Originate [...]
from Legal Research Plus
http://www.airitipress.com/index.aspx?func=journaldetail&PublicationID=201003260001
Vo.l1 No. 1. March 2010. Table of Contents Where Does Law Originate [...]
from Legal Research Plus
http://www.airitipress.com/index.aspx?func=journaldetail&PublicationID=201003260001
Reti giudiziarie europee e accesso alla giustizia alla Facoltà di Trento
Il Seminario "L'accesso dei cittadini alla giustizia: il portale della E-Giustizia" e il Convegno "Le reti giudiziarie europee: le esperienze, il potenziale,le conseguenze per la funzione giurisdizionale" sono organizzati dal Dipartimento di Scienze Giuridiche dell’Università degli Studi di Trento in collaborazione con Provincia Autonoma di Trento e Centro di Documentazione Europea - Trento, nell'ambito del Progetto Prin 2007 MaGiE (Magistrature, giurisdizioni ed equilibrio istituzionale).
I due eventi avranno luogo, rispettivamente, il 14 maggio 2010 e i 28-29 maggio 2010, presso la Facoltà di Giurisprudenza dell’Università degli Studi di Trento, Via Verdi 53 - Trento.
SUPREME COURT NOMINATIONS
Reports: Obama to Pick Kagan for Supreme Court
By Molly McDonough
May 9, 2010, 09:16 pm CDT
President Obama has selected Solicitor General Elena Kagan to succeed retiring U.S. Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens, according to reports by Politico and NBC News Sunday.
The 50-year-old progressive -- who would be the court's youngest current justice -- could serve for decades if confirmed by the Senate, making her one of the president's lasting legacies.
If confirmed, she would be the fourth woman to ever serve on the nation's highest court. Obama is expected to announce the selection on Monday.
Court watchers have long eyed Kagan for the pick, speculating the Obama administration has been nurturing her for an associate justice slot since the president first plucked her from Harvard Law School where she had served as dean.
Before Kagan's role as solicitor general, she'd never appeared before the Supreme Court. And she's never been a judge -- an attractive attribute for those who believe the court needs more professional diversity among its ranks. All of the court's current line-up served on the bench prior to joining the Supreme Court.
In a lengthy post Saturday about Kagan, SCOTUSblog's Tom Goldstein, wrote that the fact that Kagan lacks a significant paper trail means "there is little basis on which to launch attacks against her, and no risk of a bruising Senate fight, much less a filibuster."
Click here to view or post comments about this story
©, 2010, ABA Journal
domenica 9 maggio 2010
Critical Legal Conference Utrecht 2010
For accepted paper proposals up till now, please check 'Papers'. CFP: also checkwww.uu.nl/criticallegalconference2010
Critical Legal Conference startedfollowing the work of 1 person.9 days ago
Critical Legal Conference startedfollowing the work of 1 person.10 days ago
Critical Legal Conference startedfollowing the work of 1 person.14 days ago
Critical Legal Conference Call for streams is closed: for all CLC streams check www.uu.nl/criticallegalconfere nce2010about 1 month ago
Conference, Law
About
“Great Expectations”
Multiple Modernities of Law
Social developments demand, now more than ever, a critical perspective on law and legal scholarship. These developments relate to the financial and economic crisis, the continuing humanitarian wars, the rising intolerance towards others and the perceived threat they pose. They can be captured in the notions of multidimensional globalisation and enforced individualisation. Both notions reflect an ever-increasing societal complexity with which we deal in many different ways. Law is one of these ways. Fundamental is how law is used to deal with complexity. The ongoing discussion about human rights is illustrative in this regard. A critical legal perspective is required to expose “normative abuse” of law. The main theme of this conference is to re-affirm, in our global age, this critical perspective on law and its relationship with politics. Therefore, the conference takes issue with the concept of modernity. The question is whether to speak of a single modernity (be it a reflexive modernity, a liquid modernity, a second modernity, a post-modernity, etc.) or whether we should consider the possibility of “multiple modernities”. If so, what does this concept pertains to? Does it help us in understanding and criticising modern law and legal scholarship and their manifestations in different legal systems? Furthermore, does it help us in understanding and dealing with (global) contemporary problems from the perspective of human rights as a manifestation of global law, penetrating legal systems around the world? A critical attitude, hence, is not merely directed at others, as in submitting other modernities (and their legal systems) to the test of Western modernity and law. Rather, it also requires an attitude of self-criticism, i.e. a reflexive attitude.
The opening address will be given by Prof. Gunther Teubner. Prof Teubner is Professor of Private Law and Legal Sociology, Principal Investigator, Excellence Cluster "The Formation of Normative Orders", Goethe-University Frankfurt/Main and Centennial Visiting Professor, London School of Economics.
The abstract of the keynote lecture is listed under talks.
Streams are listed under papers.
Multiple Modernities of Law
Social developments demand, now more than ever, a critical perspective on law and legal scholarship. These developments relate to the financial and economic crisis, the continuing humanitarian wars, the rising intolerance towards others and the perceived threat they pose. They can be captured in the notions of multidimensional globalisation and enforced individualisation. Both notions reflect an ever-increasing societal complexity with which we deal in many different ways. Law is one of these ways. Fundamental is how law is used to deal with complexity. The ongoing discussion about human rights is illustrative in this regard. A critical legal perspective is required to expose “normative abuse” of law. The main theme of this conference is to re-affirm, in our global age, this critical perspective on law and its relationship with politics. Therefore, the conference takes issue with the concept of modernity. The question is whether to speak of a single modernity (be it a reflexive modernity, a liquid modernity, a second modernity, a post-modernity, etc.) or whether we should consider the possibility of “multiple modernities”. If so, what does this concept pertains to? Does it help us in understanding and criticising modern law and legal scholarship and their manifestations in different legal systems? Furthermore, does it help us in understanding and dealing with (global) contemporary problems from the perspective of human rights as a manifestation of global law, penetrating legal systems around the world? A critical attitude, hence, is not merely directed at others, as in submitting other modernities (and their legal systems) to the test of Western modernity and law. Rather, it also requires an attitude of self-criticism, i.e. a reflexive attitude.
The opening address will be given by Prof. Gunther Teubner. Prof Teubner is Professor of Private Law and Legal Sociology, Principal Investigator, Excellence Cluster "The Formation of Normative Orders", Goethe-University Frankfurt/Main and Centennial Visiting Professor, London School of Economics.
The abstract of the keynote lecture is listed under talks.
Streams are listed under papers.
Contact Information
Department of Legal Theory
Faculty of Law, University Utrecht
Achter St. Pieter 200
3512 HT Utrecht
THE NETHERLANDS
Faculty of Law, University Utrecht
Achter St. Pieter 200
3512 HT Utrecht
THE NETHERLANDS
+31.30.253.7083 / 7094
Iscriviti a:
Post (Atom)